3/24/2024 0 Comments Iptv simple client m3u list 2017![]() > i am already on with the changes as a forked branch for upstream push should it be needed. ![]() what hacks me off is non programmers spouting shite about technology they don't understand and maintain a defence of the indefensible. > you only have to look at the road map to see plethora of changes to introduce and strengthen the iptv and xml capabilities. > I'm abrasive because I get pissed off with the bollocks being spouted about TVH not doing what it wasn't designed for. And if you do decide to go with a PVR, for everyone's sake please ditch LibreELEC: it is a poor excuse for a proper OS and will cause you nothing but problems trying to work around its limitations (such as inability to easily upgrade core components, like a current and proper build of Tvheadend). That will in turn lead you to which types of software will work best for you. If you are interested in setting up a PVR for recording TV, I recommend doing some research on your location and providers, so you will know what type of hardware you will require. So in short, what you want is possible but not in the simple point-and-click manner you wish. If not, Tvheadend 4.2.1 (the current actual release and stable version) has minimal support for HLS streams, but I wouldn't count on them.Īlso, getting Tvheadend setup to use XMLTV-based guide data requires use of the command line, and LibreELEC does not contain the utilities necessary by default. Is it as simple as entering a URL in a dialog box, no.įirst, are the streams in your M3U MPEG-TS streams? If so, then good. 4.1 is supposed to have an easier mechanism to do it but I don't know what that is, I think you have probably already figured it out, but unfortunately you have already discovered the limitation.ĮDIT: Also be sure you have read this page: Now, if you were running the current stable version of TVHeadend (4.0.9) I would say that you could create muxes using a ffmpeg pipe. The bottom line is you are wanting TVHeadend to do something it wasn't originally designed to do. My guess is that now that this issue is on the radar it will get solved eventually, but in the Linux world "eventually" could mean months or even years, and that will in part depend on how easy or difficult the fix really is (Daz seems to think it's a piece of cake, I have my doubts about that) and what percentage of the TVHeadend user base is affected by it. I suspect that it's a bit of a combination of the TVHeadend developers being a little pedantic, and refusing to consider easy solutions because they don't fit neatly into the existing framework, and also partly that when Daz first brought up this issue he was a little abrasive about it and didn't really make anyone want to drop everything else and solve that problem, not that anyone should be expected to. I am not a programmer so I am not qualified to pass judgement on how easy or hard it would be for TVHeadend to handle these streams correctly. ![]() Maybe if he'd get to writing and spend less time posting his many complaints and jabs he'd have it written. I think there is also a way to add just the channels you really want manually, though I have an older version of TVHeadend, so can't tell you how it's done in 4.1 versions.ĭaz has said at least a couple of times now that in effect he is all through with TVHeadend and that he's going to write his own software to handle IPTV streams. If you try the scan again you might pick up another four of five channels. If a provider rate-limits how often you can make a new connection then TVHeadend's attempt to scan channels repeatedly will get it locked out on most attempts, or at least that is how I understand it. Daz has been told repeatedly that TVHeadend wasn't really designed for this usage case. Daz can be abrasive sometimes but it actually sounds like you and he are experiencing a similar issue. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |